News Detail

Fortune Publishes President Casabona’s Op-Ed on DOL’s Proposed Rule Altering Independent Contractor State Under the FLSA

On Saturday, Fortune published an op-ed from SWACCA President Scott Casabona discussing the Department of Labor’s proposed rule altering independent contractor status under the Fair Labor Standards Act and its potentially harmful effects for the construction industry. 

In his op-ed, President Casabona noted that the DOL’s proposed rule would make it easier for businesses to classify their worker as independent contractors instead of employees. The op-ed notes that “[b]usinesses relying on independent contractors do not pay minimum wage rates, overtime benefits, workers’ compensation insurance, unemployment insurance, or payroll taxes” and places American entrepreneurs who attempt to do right by their employees at a disadvantage. President Casabona draws on his own experience to highlight that the proposed rule “will undermine the entrepreneurs who create American jobs and provide economic stability for working families in favor of those who pass their business risks on to individual workers and taxpayers.”

You can read the op-ed in full below:

How a new regulation would let businesses abuse independent contractors
By Scott Casabona

In my industry—construction—the issue of classifying workers as independent contractors gained critical significance long before anyone spoke of the “gig economy.”

Over the past several decades, many industries have shifted from using employees to using independent contractors. This is because independent contractors cost less than employees. 

Why? Businesses relying on independent contractors do not pay minimum wage rates, overtime, benefits, workers’ compensation insurance, unemployment insurance, or payroll taxes. They take on virtually no entrepreneurial risk. That risk is borne instead by the independent contractor—the worker—and ultimately American taxpayers.

It is hard to understand why the Labor Department is proposing a regulation that makes it easier for more businesses to classify their workers as independent contractors instead of employees. In my experience, this will undermine the entrepreneurs who create American jobs and provide economic stability for working families in favor of those who pass their business risks on to individual workers and taxpayers.

Construction is largely a project-based industry in which the lowest bid wins the work. Labor costs can amount to 50% or more of a project’s cost. If my company’s bid is accepted and our estimates are wrong, anticipated profits can quickly turn to a loss. 

But our employees get paid for every hour worked. They get overtime pay when their work exceeds 40 hours in a week. Payroll taxes are remitted, and appropriate workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance premiums are paid. 

Honest employers bear these risks. This is the way it should be in a competitive, free enterprise system that extolls entrepreneurial risk and job creation.

Contrast this with a business model that treats the individual members of its workforce as independent contractors. In this independent contractor model, the business hired to perform the work employs few or none of the workers. Instead, each worker is treated as an independent business. 

The model requires a steadfast insistence that the individual workers are independent business operators—even though it often flies in the face of reality—because it justifies the evasion of the additional costs associated with overtime, workers’ compensation coverage, unemployment insurance, and the other basic securities offered by employers to employees since the 1930s.

Businesses using this model will always achieve a cost advantage. 

How much of an advantage? The Ohio attorney general has estimated that classifying employees as independent contractors provides a 20% to 30% labor cost advantage against law-abiding employers. When competing against a company like mine that pays middle-class wages, pays overtime, sets aside money for unemployment and workers’ compensation, sponsors registered apprenticeship programs, and offers a retirement plan and health benefits, the independent contractor model can offer a 50% cost advantage.

It should not be surprising that some businesses fully support the Labor Department’s rule reinterpreting federal law to institutionalize and encourage the independent contractor model. But our society is sure to regret these revisions. The answer to America’s economic challenges is not to encourage more companies to evade the costs and risks associated with employees. 

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed how the independent contractor model leaves workers and taxpayers in the lurch during tough times. Taxpayers are subsidizing the independent contractor model to an unprecedented degree since Congress created a new, 100%-taxpayer-funded unemployment insurance system for independent contractors. Eleven million “self-employed” people—many of whom should be treated as employees—are dependent on this program while the companies they work for pocket money that should have been set aside to cover these costs.

Under current law, the independent contractor model is prone to abuse. In many cases, it is patently unlawful. But the penalties for violating these laws are often insignificant. To people without scruples, the threat of minor sanctions is greatly outweighed by the advantages that systematic worker misclassification provides in bidding work, ensuring big profits, and avoiding entrepreneurial risk. 

The Labor Department should not encourage this cowardly vision of entrepreneurship in America’s workplace laws. It is a disservice to the nation’s workers, taxpayers, and real job creators.

Scott Casabona is president of the Signatory Wall and Ceiling Contractors Alliance.

This article originally appeared on

© 2021 Signatory Wall and Ceiling Contractors Alliance (SWACCA). All rights reserved.